This is to simulate a disaster recovery scenario, where the main server which hosts the multi TB of data fails, and to keep the business going, we use a new server to do fuse mount and temporarily serve the files from it while we are restoring files to a different server. Then use restic mount from a different server, and randomly access the files in the mount point. Steps to reproduce the behaviorīackup a 12TB directory with 65 million files spread in nearly 700 subdirectories. I'm not sure if the cache size will go up linearly when more files are accessed. In addition to above, the disk usage with cache enabled is also concerning me, randomly access a few files resulted in a multi GB cache directory. The CPU usage is worse when -no-cache is given. However when the directory contains millions of small files, the latency goes up to many minutes per file regardless of the files size.Įither way, the memory consummation and CPU usage are crappy, it uses all of the available memory on the client side (12.3GB out of 16GB physical RAM, the remaining memory are used by other applications), and the CPU usage often goes up to and stays at 100% for more than half a minute. Without the cache, random reading small files in small directory is a lot faster. With the cache, random reading small files (e.g.: cat mountpoint/snapshots/latest/path/to/small/file.ext) between a few bytes to a few MB takes many minutes because restic downloads entire pack file(s) (size between a few MB to many hundred MB) to the cache directory before serving the read request. within a few seconds), and consumes reasonable amount of RAM and CPU resource. Randomly read small files with a reasonable latency (e.g.
SFTP over Internet with high speed (100 Mbps, ping <25ms) access between the client and server Expected behavior Restic -r sftp:HOSTNAME:/path/to/restic/repo -p PASSWORD_FILE -no-cache mount /path/to/mnt/point What backend/server/service did you use to store the repository? If you choose to stain them yourself you want to make sure to use water based products, as the smell from oil based finishes can affect the integrity of the wine if the odors get into the bottle through the cork.Restic -r sftp:HOSTNAME:/path/to/restic/repo -p PASSWORD_FILE mount /path/to/mnt/point
But if you are looking to match some of the furniture in your home or prefer a certain color, then opting to stain your racks or have them pre-stained is a viable option. In fact most wood racks that are not stained or finished will get darker in color over time and gain richness. Many people prefer the look of natural wood and to keep it unfinished, which is completely safe. However any type of finish on a rack is purely for aesthetics and it does not increase the integrity of the rack.
GO64 CSW INSTALL
Oak is also used for certain kit and custom racks but can be hard to work with and install as it is an extremely dense wood.Īll of these options take very nicely to stain, lacquer and various finishes. These can be very attractive and even give off the smell of an old wine cellar. Oak is also a popular option for racks, particularly when they are produced from reclaimed oak barrels. Pine also has a tendency to emit certain odors that can be harmful to wine over time, the same goes for cedar. Pine can also be used for wine racks however it is not as dense of a wood so it tends not to produce as sturdy and stable of a rack. Both species have the natural ability to withstand the cool, humid environment in a climate controlled wine cellar.
There is also no characteristic odor associated with this species of wood, which is critical for a wine cellar as not to affect the wine. It is also an excellent choice for wine cellars due to its resistant to rotting, decay and infestation. Mahogany is a dense hardwood which is resistant to shrinking, warping and checking. As it ages natural unstained All Heart Redwood takes on increasing darker depth of beautiful color as it oxidizes. When freshly milled it ranges in color from pink to red to dark brown with reddish overlay. As the tree grows the heart takes on minerals which give it the reddish brown tones and resistance to decay. There is no other North American wood that has as much resistance to rot, mildew and insects as Redwood. Raised in the cool, damp forests of Northern California, All Heart Redwood is the perfect choice for a custom wine cellar. The two most popular woods used for customer wine cellar racking are Redwood and Mahogany. There are only a handful of woods that are suitable for use in a wine racks.
0 kommentar(er)
